As a whole, the four variables give account of 44% of the dependent variable variance (ATLG), the linear relation among variables being significant (F (4,487) = ; p < 0.001). The most important variable in the regression equation is political self-categorization (? = -0.30; p < 0.001), followed by sex (? = 0.28; p < 0.001) and religion (? = -0.11; p < 0.05). The socioeconomic level variable has no effect on ATLG scores.
Prior education imply that gay the male is analyzed more negatively when the they are supposed to be in a position to control its sexual pref-
۲۷۲ = ۴٫۹۴; p < 0.001). These differences are also reported by women, showing that they assess female homosexuality more negatively than male homosexuality (t241 = ; p < 0.001).
Finally, results above show that religious subjects and those who identify with the right in the political continuum have more negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Among religious subjects, those who give more importance to religion also reported a more negative attitude, though only in assessing lesbians (F 274) = 3.89; p < 0.05).
Acknowledging that a person was homosexual relates to one several commonly homosexual anymore, but recognizing an effective lesbian suggests an effective reformulation of one’s personal ladder
As a result of the great fit of designs, factors increase as the design match increases. Thus, the 2-grounds, second order model proposed achieves an informed match, giving the ATLG structure better independence. Results keep the hypothesis that ATLG foundation design was advanced and you may would not point in the calculating a broad grounds out of sexual prejudice, hence ATG and you may ATL, whether or not closely correlated, create obtaining a classified way of measuring prejudice into gay males and you can lesbians.
The newest component that greatest demonstrates to you bad thinking toward lesbians ‘s the questioning their visibility poses towards Old-fashioned Opinions. It curious out-of philosophy involves the transgression away from sex roles established and the wondering out-of ladies part on societal framework. The other a couple ATL proportions relate to each other lesbian’s Social Liberties therefore the Public Approve that comes off their rights and you may antique character transgression. For this reason , because of it role transgression are very https://datingranking.net/it/incontri-con-un-genitore-single/ negatively reviewed in the “machista” communities for instance the Chilean one to as well as for lesbians locate feelings strategies quicker positive than gay guys out of both heterosexual boys and females determining her or him. The scenario out-of gay males try somewhat some other as ATG proportions focus on other problems. Opinions about male homosexuality and its own nature are important.
erence (Sakalli, 2002; Verweij mais aussi al., 2008), that is, whenever homosexuality try an alternative perceptions be a little more bad. Maybe, for this reason the latest factor Opinions teams in addition to Liberties due to the fact while they is theoretically separable, homosexual men legal rights depends or perhaps be directly linked with the latest attributions heterosexual subjects give to homosexuality nature.
Ladies intercourse part transgression is more penalized than just regarding homosexual males due to the fact latter just quit a specific blessed position having its solution, therefore position on their own at the same top since virtually any societal minority class. The clear presence of an anti-minority prejudice significantly rooted in much more conservative societies must be appreciated to spell it out prejudice levels. Lesbians are different as his or her care about-affirmation issues the chances of reproducing a social model predicated on men rule. They claim an enthusiastic equalitarian updates throughout the social hierarchy. Abilities reveal that bias profile into gay guys are lowest, which transgression being a whole lot more sociably bearable than simply that lesbians.
ATLG scale properties is strong and thus succeed good signal of people attitude to your the two communities and, therefore, the size section stays pertinent. In lieu of other education (Stoeber Morera, 2007) this package signifies that ATLG is not a general discrimination index (general fundamental grounds), however it assesses a couple teams and this, even in the event with popular snacks (proving large relationship), it consist of differential aspects that make them are analyzed having special factors. In any event, the shape reviewed remains pertinent to identify such attitude teams, whatever the undeniable fact that this type of variations just weren’t considered through the its elaboration.